Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Computerized Thermal Imaging CIO (formerly COII) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tom Knudsen who wrote (28)	3/18/1998 2:31:00 PM
From: Dr. Steel	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 6039

thank you for your excellent letter Tom Knudesn. I too am still a shareholder of this company and hope that its stock will finally go up in price. The only thing is I dont appreciate being mislead by the company with false and foward looking statements without any proof. I agree,,,,,,,where the hell are you Dave?

To: Tom Knudsen who wrote (28)	3/18/1998 4:44:00 PM
From: Gwolf	Respond to of 6039

Tom, My original purchase was at $1.25 per share and I have bought stock all the way down, so I am also under water. I am fully aware of the bright outlook that was given concerning the Chinese contracts. I had some lengthy discussions with both David Johnson and Dave Packer about those contracts. I think you would need to talk to them about this, because the Chinese don't do business the way that we do. The Chinese have a complicated system of getting money released and of course there has been a major shake up in the country since their leader died. I was told that those contracts could be completed anywhere from 2 weeks to 2 years so I have never really factored them into my investment thinking. Am I a believer, yes I am. I have expressed that I am a long term investor not a speculator on this stock. I sat on Intel for years waiting for it to come to life, but it finally paid off. I do know that through all the time that I held Intel in it's infancy I got pretty discouraged and at times even sold off portions of what I held. I think it was that experience that taught me to do my homework and then hold on for the long run. Am I discouraged that the stock price isn't higher on CTI, I'm human and yes I wish it was higher than what I paid for it, but I don't think bashing the company is the way to accomplish that. I have never talked with Ed Holt, my discussions have always been with Johnson and Packer, the Chairman and President, maybe that is who you need to talk too. The company is in FDA trials, they have arranged financing, what would you be doing different if you where running the company ? Being an arm chair quarterback is always easy but when you actually have to do the job it is a different story. So I'm curious what would you be doing different. Gwolf

To: Tom Knudsen who wrote (28)	3/18/1998 8:06:00 PM
From: Gwolf	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 6039

Why would a well known hospital like the University of Southern California participate in FDA trials,Don't you think they have the capability to make a preliminary determination of the effectiveness of this technology before they became involved? Why would the FDA review pre-clinical trials and then approve CTI for full scale trials,don't you think they have the capability to discern if there is any merit to this technology, or do they just let any technology go to full scale trials. Why would Ambient Capital be willing to invest 7 million dollars in CTI, don't they have the resources to investigate the management and the technology and determine the viability of the company before making that kind of an investment? All of these organizations have been around for a while and have sophisticated procedures that they go through before they would become involved with a company like CTI. So it makes you wonder, are they wrong, or do they know what they're doing. I'll bet with their experience they know what they're doing. Gwolf