Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Corporate Vision (CVIA) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: papa bear who wrote (2503)	3/18/1998 1:53:00 PM
From: bob	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 6654

Ron, Thats been a known fact for a long time. The main reason I invested here is because it was a reporting (shell now) company. IMO, Wayne just was excited over the first filing with the SEC that may have something to do with the future of this shell. I share in Wayne's excitement! Bob

To: papa bear who wrote (2503)	3/18/1998 2:21:00 PM
From: Milk	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 6654

Ron, This was the first filing under the new management (Jack Arnold), hence the excitement. Most thread participants knew about the 'old' filings all along, it's public information. I agree there is a lot of interesting background info there. Since there are a lot of new people on this thread, these are the prerequisites for CVIA 101: SEC filings ('old'): sec.gov CVIA's 'dark' past (may feel like deja vu when you see this page): mrktvision.com 3/17/98 Form 8k (present): freeedgar.com Unofficial CVIA Shareholder Page (feel free to contribute!): pages.cthome.net Best regards, Milk

To: papa bear who wrote (2503)	3/18/1998 4:37:00 PM
From: Wayne J.	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 6654

Ron, In efforts to make sure that others are not misled ( in your opinion!) it is probably the right time for some of the newer thread participants to defend the honour of this thread! Here is the telephone number to CVIA! #1-918-747-2842.... In my opinion , when I have invested my time and long distance charges in communicating with Jack Arnold, I felt that he was as up front as he could be ( given the circumstances!) However, I don't imagine that my opinion will mean "squat" to you, based on your public accusation of my credability! I was going to invest a little more time and give a detailed response to your implication that I am trying to mislead people!--But! Instead, I'm going to spend my time researching investment opportunities, as one of my investment goals is to increase my investment value--not to be put on display to be a human dart board! I do hope for the sake of all the good and loyal people on this thread, that you start your efforts ( in keeping the members of this thread updated with all the current feedback possible) very soon, because when the fun begins, there will be many people looking for discussion and feedback!--Just for your planning! This isn't a hit and run thread! Some very solid and loyal participants make up this thread! Thanks! For making my day! ( It won't happen again!) Best Regards, Wayne J.