To: Carlo who wrote (10528 ) 3/19/1998 12:25:00 PM From: Jerry in Omaha Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 20681
Mr. Carlo, Thank you for reminding the thread of this old posting of yours:exchange2000.com This "Tight Grid" set of data does indeed bear a remarkable similarity to the numbers we are starting to get. It will be interesting to continue to chart any similarities. The company wants to make that easier, as well. Anyone interested in this company and its history should visit Naxos' web site: naxosresource.com I have been informed that the company intends to continue to support the web site making it a better information resource for us all. Charts and tables that are difficult to format on the SI page in the near future will be able to be found on Naxos' Home Page. At the risk of repeating myself yet again, and as a way of seconding other opinions expressed here, all the numbers in the world mean not one thing until we have an array of rock-solid data proving scalable, economical precious metal recovery. Only then will the true significance of the numerical data be established. I agree that the numbers are nice to see if only to impart a sense that at least some real progress is being made; a good thing. Right now the data we have collected in the past and the data coming in now will match very well to third party proven economical recovery commencing, it is hoped, in the near future. There remains much to prove, and deeply entrenched skepticism to overcome. It's not going to be easy, folks. Using Mr. Silvers' term it seems Naxos it taking a "do-over." We should all remember that in order to attract the caliber of people we all think we deserve, Naxos has to be attractive itself first -- with its act together. Mr. Kemp faces a difficult challenge. My sincere hope is that he, and the selection committee are successful in their respective efforts. Jerard P