Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : Chromatics Color Sciences International. Inc; CCSI -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JanyBlueEyes who wrote (1462)	3/18/1998 5:58:00 PM
From: Gurupup	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 5736

Janybird, and M Chen You know you are wasting your time with these guys. Give the other members of this board some credit to realize what they are trying to do.. The people that have been around for awhile couldn't care less about these guys. On another board we clicked right past all of their posts, and they soon left with their tail between their legs, and poorer, like they are going to be here also. CLICK by these guys. We don't need em, want em, they will lie, cheat and steal. I have two words for all of them Short More!!!!

To: JanyBlueEyes who wrote (1462)	3/18/1998 6:33:00 PM
From: Dan Packer	Respond to of 5736

Jane - the important issue is Zero Tolerance for Kernicterus. If this device achieves that, then it has a role. If not, not. I'm not sure of its role. And I'm not sure that the FDA has defined the role. It performed better than the naked eye and similar to 1950's technology. If you save some heel sticks and lose a baby, I don't think the child's mother will send you Valentine's cards. Love, Dan

To: JanyBlueEyes who wrote (1462)	3/19/1998 6:56:00 PM
From: M. Frank Greiffenstein	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5736

Let me support you on this one Janybird... The issue is not whether the device is better than traditional tests, the issue is whether it is at least as good. If CCSIs device is as good as heelpricks in specificty and sensitivity, then the device is better to use becasue of reduced side effects and lower costs. Prozac does not work any better than traditional tricylic antidepressants such as Elavil, but Prozac is preferred because it less "less dirty", ie.., fewer side effects. If one had their choice between two equally effective treatments, and one is less painful/more tolerable, which would you pick? DocStone