SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Y2K (Year 2000) Stocks: An Investment Discussion -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Patrese who wrote (10232)3/18/1998 11:46:00 PM
From: P. Ramamoorthy  Respond to of 13949
 
Patrese
A very good question! Ms. Judge used to post here now and then. She would help us here. There was a (legal) conference last year in SFO. I am interested in this too. Ram



To: Patrese who wrote (10232)3/18/1998 11:52:00 PM
From: C.K. Houston  Respond to of 13949
 
Patrese,

<Are there any publicy traded companies that specialize in legal services or provide services to the legal community?>

NO - we went thru this about a year ago. The lawyers don't need to "go public". Especially the ones already gearing up for Y2K. They'll make plenty of money on their own, without us.

Cheryl



To: Patrese who wrote (10232)3/19/1998 12:14:00 AM
From: Jeffrey S. Mitchell  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 13949
 
Re: Everything you ever wanted to know about Y2K legal issues:

erols.com

Note: It seems like Jeff Jinnett is at just about every Y2K conference there is. (g)

- Jeff



To: Patrese who wrote (10232)3/19/1998 11:19:00 AM
From: ThirdEye  Respond to of 13949
 
Patrese, it is illegal for law firms to be publicly owned. Conflict between legal positions and investor interest is the assumed reason. For treatises on legal issues related to Y2K, see:

comlinks.com