Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Compaq -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Analog Kid who wrote (22533)	3/19/1998 1:16:00 AM
From: Kashish King	Respond to of 97611

There's no basis for the remark because there was no remark. CNBC is not in the business of predicting anything and they always roll out the perennial bears to make cautious comments for them when the market is doing well simply to cover their ass in case of a down turn. Looks pretty bullish to me, 1900 on the Naz? msnbc.com

To: Analog Kid who wrote (22533)	3/19/1998 6:41:00 AM
From: van wang	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 97611

actually...last saturday I was talking to my investment friend and we were discussing MOT, INTC and CPQ...we both agreed that CPQ is destined to go under 20 (18-20)...and that while people think its far fetch we thought that given the near issues for INTC and MOT, we felt that the shares would have a chance of trading to 61-64 for INTC and 40-44 for MOT...this is based on our fundamental assessment of when institutional long term value investors would really step in this is just our opinion...but the technicians are not necessarily disalign with fundamental valuation people ... take a good look at their earnings estimates...for us those are the prices we would step in