SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Naxos Resources (NAXOF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: mark silvers who wrote (10593)3/19/1998 10:08:00 AM
From: knight  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 20681
 
Mark, I couldn't agree more. IMO the new CEO must not have any past ties with the current BOD. If it is found out that the new CEO is not at arms length with the BOD, the media will use this against Naxos. Naxos must use this resignation as a springboard to a fresh clean start.



To: mark silvers who wrote (10593)3/27/1998 8:18:00 PM
From: sh  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 20681
 
Mark, I must say your post on Fred Arkoosh was one of your worst and most offensive posts. The murky past of Naxos had nothing to do with Fred Arkoosh and you ought to know that as well as anyone. I don't know what you have against Fred, but the fact is he's a very successful businessman in his own right who spent months in Canada (away from his home in Nebraska) to try and get the ASE off our backs. He was not responsible for the ASE problems but rather the prior management that you seem to be defending. Fred did have something to do with the resolution of the ASE problems (he almost single-handedly resolved them) and you ought to be grateful for that. If what you say about Fred's positioning himself to be part of new management (whose your source?; actually, last I checked the Naxos Web page, he is part of management, the COO!; also, I don't believe he's on the board as you stated), I think that's great. The company needs some continuity of management even with the new management team and Fred is the ideal candidate. I'm sure if Fred was given the opportunity to be as active in managing the company's affairs as he did when dealing with the ASE, we would be in a much better position today (where the stock price is low on assay numbers that are exceptional in comparison to the industry standard).

sh