Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : BAY Ntwks (under House) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: missing who wrote (4882)	3/19/1998 8:50:00 AM
From: Bosco	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 6980

Dear missing - well, since you and I differ in opinion, we can leave it at that. However, I think in-process charges etc happen often to networkers, including BAY and CSCO, since they know the name of the game these days is to acquire or be acquired. Anyway, good luck to you with CSCO. Yes, 'bosco' is a masculine name, unless we are talking about the one in "seinfeld" <vbg> rgds Bosco

To: missing who wrote (4882)	3/19/1998 9:38:00 AM
From: rupert1	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 6980

Missing: Not that you asked - but my advice to anybody who analysed a company the way you analysed BAY in your last communication with Bosco, would be to sell. Apparently you never had a good reason to buy and apart from hoping for a better exit point you have no reason to hold. I think BAY has received more serious analysis on this thread and in the brokerage houses. But if your considered response to all of that is that the latest BAY results are a "fiasco" there is no use flogging a dead horse. Good luck. Victor