Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: StockMan who wrote (50814)	3/19/1998 6:41:00 PM
From: Tony Viola	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 186894

Stockman, Re: "MERCED simulation demo at CeBIT -- This stuff is close. Also there is silicon at .13u!!!!!!!" Thanks for the article. There are a lot of lot of lot of people waiting for Merced. I had lunch with a guy today that works at HP and worked on Merced. He said HP's part is done. Just to validate some of the things he talked about, I think it's appropriate to note some of his impressive resume. He is a computer architect and designer and has been at HP, I'm guessing, about seven years. I think he was hired to go right to work on Merced. The timing here is about right, as I think Merced kicked off, development-wise, about 1991. For about the same length of time before that, he worked at another computer company with which I am familiar, starts with A but it's not AMD (AMD is not a computer company anyway.). Before that, I think he was at IBM. I asked him how Intel engineers and architects were to work with. He said, technically, fine. I've been saying Merced, architecturally, is a mainframe on a chip. This is just another indicator (the fact that mainframe guys are being hired by HP to work on it. I'm sure Intel has been doing the same). I asked him how it looks for Merced production in 1999. He kind of hedged, didn't say the project was ahead, or behind or right on. On something this complex, his is the right answer, and I'd say the same thing. Also, it's all in Intel's hands now. However, if it were significantly behind, I think he would have said something. I didn't ask about simulated performance, because the lunch was really a get-together, or re-union of a bunch of old CPU designers that worked together in the past, and technical talk fades away in favor of reminiscences and food talk. Tony

To: StockMan who wrote (50814)	3/22/1998 1:25:00 PM
From: IanBruce	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Intel has done this before (witness the liquid nitrogen cooled Klamath demo last month). Now once again, they've used a special cooling systems to enable the processor to run faster (700MHz) than it ever would under real-world conditions - just to impress the press. I think you'll find on investigation that the Macintosh PPC chip will stay ahead of Intel chips for at least 2 more years and probably more. Also MHz doesn't tell the whole story as a 266MHz G3 PPC chip beats a 300MHz 604e PPC chip - which beats a 330MHz Intel chip. Historically, PPC chips used to be faster mostly in FPU performance, now they're faster in integer also. Ian Bruce