SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Osicom(FIBR) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: David Pawlak who wrote (6004)3/19/1998 10:33:00 PM
From: Stewart V. Nelson  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 10479
 
David

I sent an e-mail to Brooks also and found out that Osicom has only passed phase I testing and still must pass phase II. They also noted that they have not progressed to live customer trials.

The bottom line is don't expect any revenue from the GigaMux any time soon.

I have included the e-mail in my post.

regards
Stewart V. Nelson

>Does Brooks have any corporate relationship to Osicom?
>Thanks
>Stewart V. Nelson
>Snelson@izzy.net

Osicom passed Phase I testing with a BER of 10 to the -14 over a period of ninety days.

Our lab does not have any corporate affiliation with any of the vendors tested in the National Data Systems Research Lab in Stockton, CA. Prior to approval, the Gigamux must pass the second phase of the trial within the Dallas, TX metropolitan area network.

Please note that testing has not progressed to live customer trials yet and Dr. Hrubes has not approved the Gigamux for network deployment. The initial trial was encouraging but not conclusive. There were many outstanding issues regarding SNMP management, completion of drop-and-insert, and additional
wave length.

Thank-you for your inquiry.



To: David Pawlak who wrote (6004)3/20/1998 10:40:00 AM
From: marketmover  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 10479
 
I know for a FACT that the Brooks and NASA tests were STUNTS

. . . because I spoke to the group managers of the Brooks, Stockton CA lab and of the Fiber products group at Dynacs Engineering. I am sending their names and numbers to Pawlak and Crawford by pivate message. Please do not post that info here.

I have also followed up on several of the Net+Arm press clippings and have serious doubts about the veracity and objectivity of same.

FIBR will do less than 75million in sales this year and will get sued for shareholder fraud.



To: David Pawlak who wrote (6004)3/20/1998 4:46:00 PM
From: Stewart V. Nelson  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 10479
 
David

Is your position that the GigaMux has been "approved" for deployment by Brooks, in other words.....close to a purchase by Brooks?

What is the name of the gentleman who is responsible for testing? Is his first name Bob?

Did you get my e-mail with the name and time sent by Brooks? I believe it conclusively states that the GigaMux has not been approved for network deployment.

regards
Stewart V. nelson