SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : AMD:News, Press Releases and Information Only! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Kenith Lee who wrote (5098)3/19/1998 3:09:00 PM
From: StockMan  Respond to of 6843
 
Kenny,
Re -- K6 or having it as the low end since it is a bit smaller than the 3D.

I think that the K6 should be low end, because it WEIGHS less than the 3D.

Stockman



To: Kenith Lee who wrote (5098)3/19/1998 3:13:00 PM
From: AK2004  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 6843
 
Kenith
that could be. I recall their old road-map that went from k6 to k6-3d to k6-3d+ to k7. I think that amd is way behind with their 3d road-map due to low yields. If AMD is on schedule with k7 (I hope that they are) that would shortened the initially projected life of 3d chips.
Like I said I do not have a crystal ball. Those are just my thoughts.
Regards
-Albert


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News