Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : 3Com Corporation (COMS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: craig crawford who wrote (14532)	3/19/1998 6:40:00 PM
From: nigel bates	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 45548

apart from 30% better performance. Nig

To: craig crawford who wrote (14532)	3/19/1998 6:49:00 PM
From: David Lawrence	Respond to of 45548

I know you are not so naive as to believe that.

To: craig crawford who wrote (14532)	3/19/1998 6:54:00 PM
From: Eric	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 45548

Craig I couldn't disagree with you more!

To: craig crawford who wrote (14532)	3/19/1998 9:05:00 PM
From: lin huan chen	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 45548

Craig: The following maybe is the reason why BAY went up but ROK went down on bad news: Short interest BAY from 2/20 5,381,175 up 50% to 3/19 8,119,091 short interest ROK from 2/20 2,731,939 down 14.6% to 2,331,763 Short-sellers were right about BAY but sellers were on strike and mutual funds were looking for bargains, so BAY went up. However, ROK was really a surprise. Now the real question: Is recent 3COM's price weakness due to short-sellers pushing them? If that is true, 3COM's earning announcement will be a no-lose situation. Even you are right about 3COM's problem, so what? It won't go down just like BAY. Lin