Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : PYNG Technologies -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: The Warrior who wrote (1234)	3/19/1998 8:00:00 PM
From: Jim S	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 8117

Ulterior Motives People generally wants to make money...not lose.They are not concern about the future but the present. A minority has the resilience to hold ground and tough it out. Whenever those few individuals sow doubt (which are based primarily on the present and are true to some degree) the true investor gets squeezed and see their present stake taking a hit. No one likes to lose...then they are forced to sell . The ones who will gain are people like you Warrior. I guess your motives are to capitalize on the opportunity when you create a psychological effect. You are experienced in the behavior of the human being (perhaps a student of psychology?). In any event, the honest and true believers will always win. Maybe not now, maybe not here, but their lives have full meaning to them and they are the ones to enjoy whatever life offers. It is only money, that we are here in this venture for (we have to admit this). Life has a bit more to offer than this. Kindly take this graciously and without animosity, it is a fact and almost everyone on this thread will agree. The true believers will always prevail! Jim S

To: The Warrior who wrote (1234)	3/19/1998 8:33:00 PM
From: the Chief	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 8117

Another free trial membership, oh joy!!(eom)

To: The Warrior who wrote (1234)	3/19/1998 9:53:00 PM
From: Justin Curran	Respond to of 8117

<sigh> Another new member, first day on S.I., first post ever and he is slagging Pyng. Are we noticing a trend here? I welcome debate on Pyng, but I've never seen this many hostile newbies pop up on one thread, whose very purpose for joining S.I. seems to be to attack this stock. I have no idea why this is happening. Anyone care to speculate on the cause, or perhaps you guys could fill us in? Anyway, to the counterpoints.... The main complaint of the anti-PYT group seems to be the absence of sales. ProTrader, you have stated this many times. And the fact is you and the others are correct, as of this time their are no sales. What you must consider though is the ordering numbers that have been approved by NATO and the U.S. ARMY. Do you think they would set up the mechanism for ordering the FAST1 if they had no intention of placing any orders? These ordering numbers show a clear intention, by both these organizations, to place orders once field trials have been completed to their satisfaction. The fact is this stock has gone up in anticipation of sales. If this upsets some of you I am sorry, but that is the way the market works now. Look at Amazon.com, they took a loss last year but their current market cap is 1.8 Billion and the stock continues to move upward. How about Yahoo? or Ballard Power?(began life on the VSE by the way) P/E's of 4193 and 1870 respectively. What do these companies have in common, (besides some would say being overvalued <g>) people are driving the share price up in anticipation of what they will accomplish in the future. I'm not comparing Pyng to these companies(or MSFT for that matter, nobody should be compared to MSFT) but most people on this thread, myself included, belive in Pyng and belive that great things are in store for them. We are buying the share according to the potential of Pyng and it's product. O.K. next, your point about some "smart entrepeneurs coming up with a competitive product" The fact is people have been working on devices to achieve intraosseous infusion for many, many years. Only Pyng has developed a product that works. Their are only two other devices that have been tested by other companies. One takes a doctor 20 minutes to use, the other resembles a giant metal corkscrew. Pyng literally has no competition, and a 17 year patent to insure things stay that way. Bottom line, this device will save lives. If your veins have resessed due to shock from an injury(in accident or combat), it will enable the paramedics to give you blood. In most countries Hospitals are required by law to provide the best possible medical devices for patient care. To do otherwise would open themselves up for potential lawsuits. If this device is accepted by the U.S. Army and is proven to save lives, then it will become standard issue in every Ambulance and E.R. in Canada, America and Europe. How that for a potential market? As always, good fortune to PYT shareholders. Justin Curran