Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : PYNG Technologies -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: The Warrior who wrote (1238)	3/19/1998 11:05:00 PM
From: PeterS	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 8117

Well Warrior, you are making a good point and you are supporting my concerns presented in #1134 (or somewhere around). However, PYT is IMO a better-than-average VSE stock. I don't know about EMI but I would suggest that to manufacture CT scan is far more complicated than this FAST thing, therefore it is far more prone to failure without proper management team. Also I would think that a purchase of CT scan by institutions would be considered a capital expense and would be subjected to different and more restrictive approval procedures than purchase of couple dozens of FAST units. My point: IMO your example is likely not a valid one. Could you comment? Secondly, coming back to my "better than average statement" above, PYT is a perfectly good penny stock (with all what belongs to the definition of a penny stock, i.e., cheap, unproven, esoteric, speculative, ...) and when you said that the stock is not worth buying I assume you meant at this price level. Below $4 it becomes a good buy ... at least what I consider a good buy, i.e., acceptable risk. I think you will get an opportunity to jump in as I also assume that you joined SI to learn more about PYT. For all others who keep preaching about PYT (TLamos, mft, mj160, Justin Curran, ...): THIS STOCK DOES NOT HAVE ANY FUNDAMENTALS, ONLY GOODWILL. So all the facts about FDA, patents, NATO # etc. are already well accounted for in the price and I believe you are doing more damage to a small investor than the warrior who brings in a critical perspective. extaurus: 21 zillions shares speaks by itself for your confidence in PYT. Cheers Peter

To: The Warrior who wrote (1238)	3/20/1998 8:03:00 AM
From: the Chief	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 8117

Well Warrior. If you just wanted to comment that Pyng wasn't worth buying, thats fine, you've done it! Now in your 30 day free trial, make sure you visit all the other sites that you don't think are worth buying too. That will take you at least a month. A lesson for you! In every thread there are optimist, pessimists, longs and shorts we try to live harmoniously and appreciate constructive criticism. Now what we have, are people who have "watched" for years the SI thread comments, comments made by people who "paid" for the privledge, getting a "free 30 day membership. What you get is 100's of people who want to take "their shot" popping up on all the threads. I have sent an e-mail to the webmistress expressing my disgust that they would do this to an already "semi-disfunctional SI". I would suggest all others do it as well. Everyday we will be bombarded with 30 day wonders who will do little else but disrupt the thread. You said: I may have been a little harsh on you shareholders but just want to dispel a little of the euphoria as it is a tad exuberant. So is your mission to "suppress exuberance"? What makes you an authority. Have you an expertise in "Pyng" that would make us believe you know more than us? Is there anything wrong with people supporting each other with "exuberant" comment when their stock is under pressure? You'll learn the Chief