Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: go4it who wrote (31065)	3/19/1998 11:08:00 PM
From: PETE STONEY	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 35569

Chuck, Looking back at some of the past posts about the NASDAQ delisting-- there seemed to be a negative spin to them. I'm not sure how this all started if it was NASDAQ initiating the delisting or if it was IPM that was requesting the delisting. In reading the IPM press release dated Feb 12th, to me it looked like IPM was requesting the delisting hearing. I know its hard to second guess what IPM's intentions are but maybe IPM would not view the delisting as a negative. Time will tell. I still believe IPM can and will do what they started out to do. Pete

To: go4it who wrote (31065)	3/19/1998 11:21:00 PM
From: Bruce McGaughey	Respond to of 35569

As some of you know, I keep track of IPM's institutional activity, as reported to me by my Telescan Market Guide Service. In the past, we determined that these numbers are somewhat suspect because Telescan doesn't keep up with the current number of shares outstanding. I am providing the data here, and have provided them to you in the past, simply as an illustration. I do not stand behind them, nor do I recommend purchasing shares in IPMCF, based on this information. It's up to you to do your own due diligence with regards to the company and actual institutional activity in the stock. This is an illustration. There may be other information out there that is different, one way or another. It's up to you to go find it. # inst % shrs 3mo net buying 8-16-96 8 19.17 0.60 8-30 10 31.94 1.36 9-6 11 32.59 1.39 11-22 13 32.60 1.00 11-29 13 32.60 1.00 1-10 12 33.72 0.65 1-17 12 36.97 0.88 1-24 12 36.97 0.88 1-31 12 36.97 0.88 2-7 12 36.97 0.88 2-14 11 35.91 1.01 2-21 12 40.52 1.26 3-7 13 42.64 1.37 3-14 13 42.64 1.37 3-27 13 42.64 1.37 4-11 14 47.61 1.60 4-18 14 47.61 1.60 4-25 15 48.65 1.60 6-6 13 41.49 -0.04 6-13 15 58.78 1.08 6-20 16 69.23 1.83 6-27 16 69.23 1.83 7-3 16 69.23 1.83 7-11 16 69.23 1.83 7-18 16 69.23 1.88 7-25 16 69.23 1.88 8-1 17 69.29 1.89 8-8 17 69.29 1.89 8-15 17 69.29 1.89 8-22 17 69.29 2.39 8-29 17 75.05 2.28 9-5 17 75.05 2.28 9-12 17 81.08 1.88 10-10 20 35 1.84 (This is when #shares were adjusted) 10-24 21 35 1.84 10-31 21 30 0.04 11-7 21 30 0.04 11-14 21 30 0.04 11-21 21 30 0.04 11-28 21 30 0.04 1-2-98 23 30.16 -0.48 1-9 23 30.16 -0.48 1-16 23 30.16 -0.48 1-30 23 30.16 -0.48 2-20 24 35.82 -0.09 2-27 24 35.82 -.0.09 3-13 24 35.39 1.00