SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Information Architects (IARC): E-Commerce & EIP -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: stox19 who wrote (5108)3/20/1998 10:44:00 AM
From: RWS  Respond to of 10786
 
Your post was harsh and crude. "Respect yourself."

RWS



To: stox19 who wrote (5108)3/20/1998 10:53:00 AM
From: tech  Respond to of 10786
 
Hey Tech..... shhhhh don't say anything about the loses going up.

It doesn't matter..

stox19: Sales went up over 29,000% ! Any company that can go from $37,000 in sales to $11 million in a year is just great.

tech: but... although that is true the loses went up more than 55% from -$5 million to approx. -$8 million

stox19: Damn it tech. Don't you understand that ALYD is just like a copy shop. They have to set up the foundation so then they can start producing.

tech: oh, okay ALYD was just adding all these people and all the overhead so they could start producing..... Wait, didn't you fearless leader "slick" Bob say that they wanted to have 500 people in 1998 and a 1,000 people in 1999. Since they only have about 300 people, isn't their overhead going to explode even more when they go out and try to hire all these people in such a competitive marketplace ?

sox19: tech. we don't care about numbers, loses, etc. All we care about is pushing this stock. We have our sources and they let us know when to buy.

tech: sources ??? didn't you know that trading on inside information is illegal ?

sox19: inside information ? Hell no tech. All we have to do is read the Charlotte Business Journal ... It's all there!



To: stox19 who wrote (5108)3/20/1998 11:02:00 AM
From: Robert K. Sims  Respond to of 10786
 
I should have address this post to you last night, I am sure you noticed it, it was address to robert sims by mistake.

If it was a mistake then I accept it as such and sorry I blasted you. No Problem.

Robert K Sims