Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Bearcat (BEA-C) & Stampede (STF-C) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: grayhairs who wrote (671)	3/20/1998 12:01:00 PM
From: Wayne	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 2306

grayhairs BEA net position Capel 550,000 gundy 186,000 Nesbit 119,797 yorkton 32,457 Latimer 28,500 first Marathon 20,357 STF net position firstMarathon 485,000 Greenline 153,500 Georgia Pacific 100,000 Yorkton 61,936 Dates from Mar 02, to today Mar 20, as of 10 pm today Re tusk - good man I also have shares Wayne

To: grayhairs who wrote (671)	3/20/1998 1:13:00 PM
From: Keith Minler	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 2306

Hi Grayhairs; When I think about it Berkely would not likely take up that option until after the land sale. The second well start must have been another of those ubiquitous rumours. I see Wayne has already posted net rights positions, I might add that the only major seller has been Cannacord, at least for Stampede, they are at minus 484,975. This information is available at the Canada-Stockwatch site, use the Intra-day Java appelet. I think you have to be a subscriber to access it. Working through the trades day by day no pattern emerges. Some time, when you have time, could you explain to me why water in wells is such a big deal. Over the years there have been several disappointing results ascribed to water. As I see it water and oil don't mix, it doesn't seem like too large a technical difficulty to separate the oil and water and as a bonus sell the water to California! Later Keith

To: grayhairs who wrote (671)	3/20/1998 8:10:00 PM
From: gamer	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 2306

grayhairs; I enjoy reading your posts;very informative. My question is why would anyone bother with the rts. at this point? Could it be that these rts. where offered in the hope shareholders would exercise them even though we have no results of the wells,(good or bad).Is this BEA/STF's way of assuring themselves that at least they get to raise some money to keep going at our expense. If the results are good BEA/STF would have no problem raising money and getting more per share.But if the results are not what we hope , the shares wouldn't even be worth .30 a share. I was expecting to see an upward movement to the .80 range by now. Why the rts. are still trading at.01 is what puzzles me?