Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : ACRT about to move to new highs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Goulds who wrote (3996)	3/20/1998 2:03:00 PM
From: stan s.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 7054

Lurkers take note. If anyone still labors under the mistaken impression that these posts lack organization. The following gentlemen Dan, David S, Don, Lloy, Scott and Second Gunman also post on CCSI. My apologies to anyone undeserving of being lumped in the above list. Double regrets to those I've excluded, that yearn to be on it. Take note of response #1490 by one of the regulars on that thread with regard to their efforts. Have a look. Message 3772238 Does this, by rote, mean their questions lack validity. No...but remember the source, ponder the intent. Interesting, huh? Course it's probably just a coincidence. Stan

To: Goulds who wrote (3996)	3/20/1998 5:08:00 PM
From: Jean-Philippe Chevalier	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 7054

Davey, What an exhilarating day! Much of the conversation on this thread has returned to rational discussion on fixing a value for Actrade based on fundamental analysis. Much to my credit I might add. Meanwhile there was still a modicum of bantering by the davef crew continuing along the lines of irrational exuberance and unbound euphoria. Davey, I would be remiss if I did not again remind you that I am still waiting for you, as leader of the long (winded) Actrade faction, to provide summary data on Actrade's top five TAD customers, including the value of their total TADs for the quarter and also provide a total number of TAD users for the last quarter. Time is running out and if I don't receive your reply soon, I will have to ask the general population for assistance. Of course, if you need more time to compile the data, just post a note stating your intention to provide the requested information. Also of note today, Teri properly deposited one of davef's posts on to davef's thread. Kudos for Teri. Now on to the daily stock picking contest. What good fortune it is to have a triple witching day so early in the competition. A special treat for the three Actrade cheerleaders, who came adorned in their normal attire, broomsticks included. They didn't have to change into mini-skirts and rustle those annoying pom-poms. Like the cheerleaders, things got ugly early for ACRT. By early afternoon, many of the faithful had already departed for the parking lot. One observer proclaimed, "If all you wanted to know was who was going to win, I could have saved you the price of a ticket." To the good fortune of those remaining, Actrade put on the greatest comeback of in their competitive history, closing moderately close to AHG. davef - who's only known stock pick, ACRT, closed at 12 5/8 cutting their owners losses for the day to just under 3% of the market cap. Mr. Pink's pick for the competition, the dog of His portfolio, AHG, closed at 11 7/16, down a TAD or two. In a rare mid-game interview, Mr. Pink predicted that the stock prices of AHG and ACRT will continue to converge and switch positions in the near future. Some analysts said he should be ashamed for forecasting such an obvious event that it has yet to be contested by davef. In fact, davef is commanded to have his chartist record the event for posterity. The winner for day 4 is Mr. Pink: 3/20/98 AHG 11 7/16 -3/16 down 1.61% 3/19/98 AHG 11 5/8 -1/8 down 1.06% 3/18/98 AHG 11 11/16 + 1/8 up 1.08% 3/17/98 AHG 11 9/16 unchanged 3/20/98 ACRT 12 5/8 -3/8 down 2.88% 3/19/98 ACRT 13 -3/8 down 2.80% 3/18/98 ACRT 13 3/8 + 1/16 up 0.47% 3/17/98 ACRT 13 5/16 -3/8 down 2.74% Cumulative results: Mr. Pink 4 davef 0 This concludes the first week of competition. Connoisseurs of stock picking excellence around the globe await Monday's competition, which will be posted here after the close. Yours in public service, Don.

To: Goulds who wrote (3996)	3/20/1998 5:57:00 PM
From: Mr. Pink	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 7054

Mr. Puryear's report is an embarrassment. He made many substantial errors such as 1) His projections are not tax effected. 2) He cited Summit Bank as a source of capital even though the line has been yanked. Mr. Puryear is a bit senile. You should talk to him. He is rather nice but completely incompetent and works, of course, for a bucket shop that Mr. Pink has never heard of. Mr. pink As for your lie about the lawyer why not read the complaint. Two lawyers appear on the last page, Furman and Delcore in Long Island and haythe & Curley in New York 212-880-6000. Mr. pink does not suggest you contact these people until you actually do some work and read the complaint. Mr. Pink will not tell you the name of the attorney working on the matter; you will have to read it for yourself. You do know how to read, don't you, you criminal. Mr. Pink

To: Goulds who wrote (3996)	3/21/1998 11:54:00 PM
From: Jean-Philippe Chevalier	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 7054

Dave, You still have not answered my question on the top five customers of Actrade. You appear to have blown it off, but have not formally so stated. Although you have not requested it, I am granting a short extension for you to provide a response. This is to provide your underlings on this thread the anguish of responding and for you to provide a definitive response as the leader you claim to be. I have granted your extension in your absence. It is uncharacteristic of you to be off this thread for such a long time, especially in prime time like this. Therefore, I am hoping that you are off putting together a definitive response to my question. I can't think of what else could possibly detain you from this thread, unless the webmistress tossed you for ethical violations. If the latter is true, we will proceed on this issue without you. Looking forward to your response and associated data in the very near future. Your Humble Public Servant, Don