Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Osicom(FIBR) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Agenda who wrote (6075)	3/20/1998 6:33:00 PM
From: Eddy Blinker	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 10479

jduffy I am still waiting for the other half of the deal... < If this is a fact then please do us all and mostly me a favor and post this E/Mail from you to Mr.Crawford and the other way around on this very thread. All you have to do is cut the entire e/mail section and paste it on this thread. Yes indeed if you do that I will offer you my sincere apologies for doubting your credibility right here and now.> That was the deal. You truly did not think that I would be interested in the part you posted to Mr.Crawford. I am interested only in facts, such as you advertised to have: " Mr.Crawfords reply to you confirming to you as you have posted " I KNOW it is a scam ". No more. No less. Only clear statements which can be utilized in court are valid. Slander does not know a border line. What everyone knows is no slander. The statement of marketmover is a perfect example. If he can show the underlying facts to his statement that OSICOM staged the Gigamux tests with BROOKS and NASA then he is home and try. However if he can not then he will hang on the rule tree of the SEC. Its about time this thread gets its act together and deals with the only issue and that is how to make money. Stop counting the break lines in the chairmans underwear and concentrate on demasking the true clowns. If OSICOM states in public that the Gigamux was put on the approved product list then it means to me that the product has been approved for purchase by any department of Brooks. And of course one would have to know the conditions attached to that approval. To read more into it would be dreaming. Different is the marketmovers statement because it implies that not only shareholders were duped but BROOKS and NASA as well. My suggestion therefore is to concentrate on marketmovers statement first and go from there. ED