SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : VLSI Technology - Waiting for good news from NASDAQ !!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: DanZ who wrote (3218)3/20/1998 8:01:00 PM
From: Kevin Hay  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 6565
 
I'm back, long @ 17 3/8. Besides the apparently strong support
where we're at, my main reason is that I think VLSI is due to surprise
on the upside. If not in eps, then on outlook.

Anecdotely there's CLST, a cellular distributor, that just reported
earnings 0.02 above consensus. a) this gives evidence that the
'inventory adjustment' line we've heard is true, as I know CLST's
inventory had been getting huge, and that cellular demand
remains strong.

However, I'm braced to average down. 16 won't surprise me too
much, and I think the market will have to really tank to see 15.

TGIF...,
-Kevin



To: DanZ who wrote (3218)3/20/1998 10:25:00 PM
From: Joe C.  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 6565
 
Dan, 17 ish today, 15 on the down side, 22 on the up side are reasonable likely numbers - 2 down versus 5 up - seems like its' worth the risk short term. Long term (early next year) we're looking at high 20's (let's say 10 points to 27 ish). That's 60% return -sounds high - let's take off 10% and make it a round 50%. That's 10 years' worth of interest for a bank CD. Now let's take a real bad scenario - say they lose Ericson all together or the market corrects, drops to book value (I seem to remember 12 - not sure), they've shown they can get out of bad situations (i.e. pc market) to move to more profitable areas (DVDR, etc.). Every way I look at the numbers I see more reward then there is risk. These numbers are pure gut instinct, unlike your TA (great posts by the way), totally unscientific, emotion filled reasoning which is probably somewhat influenced - in a subconscious sort of way - by all the posts/articles/analysis that I've read. However, the bottom line in my opinion is how could you not invest in this company? Joe C.



To: DanZ who wrote (3218)3/25/1998 3:47:00 AM
From: Naveen Kumar  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 6565
 
Dan:
You state the buys were mostly 5K shares. What is your source for real time data that gives you volume information ? Is there a fee for getting this data ?
Thanks