Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Crystallex (KRY) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Moot who wrote (7271)	3/20/1998 8:30:00 PM
From: Gutman	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10836

Re. the POA, what about the argument that Dot de Lemon obtained the desired benefit from the transaction; namely, the extinguishment of her debt to Torres. It is my understanding that this extinguishment was recorded in a lower court.

To: Moot who wrote (7271)	3/20/1998 10:06:00 PM
From: Blue On Black	Respond to of 10836

I agree. Beaten to death arguments. The key has been the DECISION. It has alway been ... next week...soon....ect. We have been told that the decision is made...just a matter of politics. This news letter says THIS... another one says THAT. Asenio says THIS. When the DECISION comes it will be worth X$X$X$. Let's see the decision. Everytime I have watched a stock that had this many 'Next week and real soon' involved, someday never comes. (Contracts are on the desk - apparently with the Decision on this case). When the DECISION comes then we can discuss how much the concession is worth and what type of 'weenie' Asenio is. Where is the Decision - other than next week...again. Sorry, just one too many 'next weeks' for me. Sorry - JMHO. lee