Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Golden Eagle Int. (MYNG) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Pianoman1997 who wrote (1263)	3/21/1998 1:06:00 AM
From: Ironyman	Respond to of 34075

Dan,,,,The ONLY reason for this stock to be this low is that it is ...being MANIPULATED!!!! Look at 3:50!!! .....Someone wants the price to stay down,,,,Only one reason for it at this level......It must be real!..........Futile,,,,However they are working very hard at it This is one ship which I was willing to ride out the storm. .........The shell is how they received it,,,I also didn't like it ...eight months ago! ............................................................................................................. Howard J. Ruff did a book back in 1979..." How to prosper during the comming bad years"......Funny,,,,My daddy already had a copy. ............................................................................................................. The eight sided dice roll on despite the cow droppings!

To: Pianoman1997 who wrote (1263)	3/21/1998 1:53:00 AM
From: Douglas Lapp	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 34075

Yes, Barricks i believe, not sure where though, i'll try and find out. Politically the Eagle is solid. Help me out Mr.Z, Rene Vasquez, VP or is it President of Eagle Mining Bolivia was once on President Banzars cabinet and is an old school chum. My Bolivian source tells me that Paravicini was offered a very high profile cabinet position. Yes I think we are safe politically. To Jay Z: What happened to Red River Mining? (Hope it's the correct name) Might politics have something to do with its demise?

To: Pianoman1997 who wrote (1263)	3/21/1998 3:13:00 AM
From: CIMA	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 34075

I've said it before and I'll say it again... You want credibility? 1) Proven historical presence of gold. 2) Independent U.N. studies made this century. 3) Tremendous government connections and support in Bolivia. 4) The president of the company who is the only lawyer in the world licensed to practice in the U.S. and Bolivia. 5) Top geologists who are experts on Bolivia. 6) An Advisory Board made up of ex-Barrick and Newmont executives from senior positions in finance, mineralogy and metallurgy. 7) 1000 assays ready for release, every tenth one double-checked by a lab in England. 8) Moody's coverage a done deal. 9) And Bradley on board actually smiling! These are facts! Do you think these people would risk their lives in a post-BreX scam of greater proportions? Would a newly-elected national government give a medal to this company for contributions to the country and its people and then ask the company to assist in writing foreign investment mining legislation because it's a scam? The future of foreign investment in gold mining in Bolivia is going to be a boon for this country for decades to come. They aren't going to pull "an Indonesia" out of the gate! Sabrina mentioned two other things that might interest some. First, Golden Eagle will try to get a Nasdaq listing this year. They are sick of the market manipulators on the Bulletin Board. And second, should things go well, Golden Eagle will rent an auditorium in Denver for all MINErs to assemble for one hell of bash to celebrate the success. I hope her vision becomes reality. We're in the countdown to launch, T minus 10 days and counting. P.S. I sense your objectivity waning...

To: Pianoman1997 who wrote (1263)	3/21/1998 6:53:00 AM
From: Mike McFarland	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 34075

Your cautionary statements are appreciated, although I have to say, it is almost like you are trying to talk the stock down. Trying to pick up some more shares but annoyed that it keeps jumping up 10% every couple days? ;-) I think it is prudent to view any penny gold stock with a healthy dose of scepticism, but we know that there is some value in GE's claims and contracts, so even if the new samples are disappointing the downside risk is not huge, maybe we go back and test the lows, but this wont go to zero. Clearly there has been quite a bit of groundwork laid--it would not surprise me to see one of the big gold mining companies sweep in and buy everything out, making any concerns about GE's itself moot, I mean if Newmont dangled 100M in front of GE, don't you think they would take it? I could live with a buck a share (although the aquirer would be getting awfully cheap gold if reserves are proved...) Now, will the new numbers be a disappointment, I rather doubt it, I would guess that you don't pay for 1000 tests to see if there is gold there, they know where the gold is--you pay for 1000 samples to build credibility and just to be sure you direct the most effort toward the best holes--no sense in leaching anything but the highest concentrations. Thoughts from you gold experts out there, seems straitforward. Finally, will some selling soon slow the stock's ascent. I for one will take some money off the table above 16 cents, that will have paid for my bet. But I am sure there are a lot of people getting ready to cash in 50k shares, but it is kind of a pittance. We watch a million or two shares trade hands each day, but that is not very much money--$140,000 at 14 cents right? ha ha ha, if MINE ever gets on the SI hotlist, or ever gets a visible mention on CNBC or in the Journal, imagine if some real money tried to pick up shares! There are not enough shares available for real money! This thing would just gap up a dime...or more. Just my thoughts, hmmm, chart looks good lately.

To: Pianoman1997 who wrote (1263)	3/23/1998 2:02:00 PM
From: Dean Fontana	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 34075

Dan to use you words "Meanwhile I wait and see, sometimes when you wait; even if you buy at a higher price it is not as much risky because there are less uncertainties." I tend to disagree! my position ranges .10,.21,.41 and .76. I have been in since December 96 and will be around in Dec 98. The price per share creates no legitimacy to the risk. ALL STOCKS ARE A RISK. I agree there is some saftey in large pricess of well know stocks, however your profit is always less. Of course I have convinced over 35 coworkers and friends this is a great investment opertunity, they all got in around .70 and are still in with PMA (thanks Jakel) and have even increased their positions. I look at these prices as prime time buying. Doug Brian I will see you........(at the Top) and I will take my shaken not stired.. Dino