Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Global Games Corporation is on the move (GLOW) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: oopps who wrote (360)	3/21/1998 7:33:00 AM
From: Double Dipper	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 720

oopps, Noticed your profile, another hit and run poster without anything of substance to add. Please bring us facts or go away. Thank you. Good bye,

To: oopps who wrote (360)	3/21/1998 12:14:00 PM
From: CO	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 720

oopps, They are NOT claiming .50 eps for 1997. That is an ESTIMATE for 1998. This is one of the reasons that I think GLOW is so undervalued. Of course most brokers have not heard of GLOW. It is a penny stock. I don't know of many brokers that pay much attention to a penny stock. They wait for it to go to $5.00 and then try to get you to invest. I would prefer to take the risk at the lower price myself based on my own research. In the past I have made some of my largest profits on stocks my broker tried to talk me out of buying. I got rid of that problem. I switched to an on-line discount broker. Why should I pay big commissions to a broker when I am doing my own research and my broker doesn't know anything about the stock. I love to find undervalued companies that brokers dislike. But because they do carry a greater risk, I continue to do extensive research on the company to help reduce my risk. For example, I first bought FAMH at .17. It is now at .60 and is still moving up in stair-steps. I still continue to do my DD on FAMH just as I am doing on GLOW. And I like what I see. GLOW is not a huge company. It only has about 12 to 15 employees. Most of its revenue comes from recurring electronic transactions. So overhead is very low. Not every successful company has to have a big sign out front. I do suggest that everyone do their own research and not just take my word for it. With penny stocks, when you don't do your own research, that is usually where you get into trouble on your investment. It helps you do what is right for you. Good Luck, Cheryl

To: oopps who wrote (360)	3/21/1998 1:57:00 PM
From: Bulgar	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 720

oopps... You are wasting your time here oopps...in the last couple of months I've noticed more and more people on different threads checking the names of posters and when they became members...it will take some good solid facts, objectivity and time before you establish any kind of credibility...especially since your a visitor...the established members who aren't afraid of putting in some kind of biography are becoming savvy to the games new visitors and even new members are playing...if you were serious, you would have become a member without the trial period...If your familiar with the SI Board, then a trial period isn't even necessary...I wish SI would eliminate the 30 day trial...SI already allows people to lurk...that should be enough for a person to decide if he wants membership. As far as stockbrokers are concerned, they were the reason I got out of the market back in the late 70's...I found they knew less than I did...they remind me of used car salesman in a $500 suit...the majority leave a lot to be desired and those that are good are hard to find. They won't waste their time on penny stocks...why????...because they can't make a good commission. When the internet made business information and discount brokers available for the everyday investor, I jumped back into the market...it still isn't a level playing field, but a hell of a lot better than it was in the late 70's and 80's. You mentioned Merrill Lynch and Paine Weber, two of the most expensive commission brokers in the market...If these are the people making decisions for you, then I have to tell you the truth...I'm the guy who sold you the OCEAN FRONT PROPERTY IN ARIZONA that your STILL trying to get rid of... Best of luck at whatever your game is... With respect...Bulgar

To: oopps who wrote (360)	3/21/1998 7:21:00 PM
From: Andre Daedone	Respond to of 720

oopps: I love Arizona and yes I would be willing to buy ocean front property there, but can I get it right near the Grand Canyon. How much is it going to cost me??? As for Glow like all penny stocks can be very lucrative. Even if the penny is a complete loser holding it until the MM get greedy and start a momentum run can be beneficial. The gains of penny's are far more great on a daily basis that any other stock out there. I have been buying penny's for about 10 months now and I am now just starting to get the jist of penny stocks. So I guess you could call me a penny stock virgin. They are fast and fun. Not for the light hearted or the negative minded. With penny's you must have guts of steel and be willing to hold. Merrill Lynch and Paine Weber and Charles Scwabb are the big boys. They play with people who are unaware or uninterested in penny stocks. Keep and open mind and make some money. That is what we are all doing here, isn't it, try to making money for trips, security or whatever. Don't buy GLOW, but don't dis it either. Watch it and see what happens!! You may learn something. Andr‚