Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : WAVX Anyone? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: M. Frank Greiffenstein who wrote (1441)	3/21/1998 8:10:00 PM
From: SlateColt	Respond to of 11417

I'd say don't waste your money...buy 800 or so more shares instead... I'd be willing to be that much more meaningful information is disseminated here in this forum than in the report. Often times, those "high priced" reports contain nothing more than a summary of stuff that is public knowledge plus the opinion of some analyst(s). If there were more information in that report that we weren't privy to, I think our dear WAVX would be significantly higher than a buck fifty. Regards... ---Scott

To: M. Frank Greiffenstein who wrote (1441)	3/21/1998 8:49:00 PM
From: jas singh MD	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 11417

Good evening Frank, I think I'll take that $1300 and BUY MORE WAVX instead. Honestly, do you believe that some analyst who just started to pick up on this company knows more about WAVX than some of us on this board do. I think that we are very fortunate to have some of our on-line friends who KNOW where and how to obtain relevant information. For example, I think it was Marty...although I'm not 100% sure , that alerted us to the Wallstreet Forum presentation. For my money and time, I got more out of PERSONALLY listening to Sprague than anything an analyst can write. In regards to the OEMs point that some of us have been discussing, the term was used in a specific way during the Q&A session. If I may repeat what was said during the presentation: Q: Why aren't all of the OEMs stumbling over themselves to get your chip onto their products? A: They ARE now that the first (IBM) has signed on board. **These aren't the exact words but close to the jist of it. Please check my post in late Feb/early March for the exact words that were mentioned** Therefore, although some are correct in saying that we already may have multiple OEMs on board, they were present prior to the signing of IBM. Therefore, why would Mr. Sprague imply that the other OEMs are stumbling over themselves since the first(IBM) came on board.Therefore, I tend to believe that we all may be hearing something in the not too distant future. Obviously, these are only my opinions. I would be interested to hear what everyone else thinks. Does anyone think the dramatic increase in volume means anything besides traders having some fun? Sincerely, Jas