SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : Rocky Mountain Int'l (OTC:RMIL former OTC:OVIS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: bmart who wrote (44205)3/21/1998 5:56:00 PM
From: David R  Respond to of 55532
 
So you have followed this thread since last August, but you are only a guest since the 17th. You did not come off as crass. You came off as a man with a motive. Don't give me that underdog crap. Did it ever occur to you that the underdogs were not Riley, but the hundreds of shareholders who have been left out in the cold? You see, you act as if this is short-nays against RMIL share holders. This is short-nays + shareholders who think they've been screwed agains Riley, Pugs, and RMIL's inept (if not criminal) management. If you were truly rooting for the underdogs, you would be rooting for the share holders who haqve been left holding worthless paper. Not some hypothetical squeeze. Unless RMIL establishes creddibility by reporting the true state of the company, and the true value of its assets, as well as the status of the alleged $10M, this dog will never trade again, and the squeeze is dead along with the company. There is nothing that the short-shills can do to stop RMIL from trading. Only RMIL itself can mess up now.

You see my friend, you are too biased for your story to be true. How can you be so sure that Morgan and Brenton have not dumped shares. Certainly you are not so naive as to base your entire position on a phone call, and SI postings from people you do not even know (who may or may not be real). You are either very stupid, or you are playing games. Or both.

Did I say conspiracy? Hmm. Don't recall that one. BTW: Do you think that I part of some short conspiracy?



To: bmart who wrote (44205)3/21/1998 9:03:00 PM
From: Hawkmoon  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 55532
 
This ensemble has entertained me from last August. I followed along like the ladies at the office follow their soaps. I believe I have defined the protagonists and the antagonists accordingly.

bmart, you might have stopped and pondered the possibility that many of us are as fascinated by this story just like you claim to be.

The difference is that we decided long ago to participate in this little soap opera and provide a little critical script editing and objectivity to counter the enthusiastic misrepresentation of certain of its shareholders and representatives.

Now folks like you come out of the dark alleys of cyberspace to accuse us of being part of some conspiracy while making those who have perpetrated this entire situation as "heroes".

bmart, if you're hooked enough to be out there watching from the sidelines for so long, give us a little credit for being also so obsessed. Heck, your first post on the SI system was to this thread and you have been spreading the RMIL "gospel" of the short squeeze to almost every other thread you have visited.

I'll tell you straight out that I would love to have seen Mmkrs get pounded for over-selling this stock, had we had proof of such activity. They're day-traders for their firms and hold excessive power over stock prices and are a necessary evil for which they are well compensated.

But even you will have to admit that this company has done very little to assist shareholders in substantiating the claims of the Cartel and others. But you and I also know that the Cartel could not have formulated these ideas in a vacuum.

Tell me why Morgan and Breton are hiding behind their sock-puppets?? If there is a short position, prove it and announce it for all to see. Damn well put the fear of god into the mmkrs as people scream "SHORT SQUEEZE!!!"

But you know none of this has happened and their is nothing but non-binding verbal discussion of this issue. The fact that no one wants to put it in writing leaves a stench over the entire subject matter.

Regards,

Ron



To: bmart who wrote (44205)3/22/1998 2:59:00 AM
From: Skeeter Bug  Respond to of 55532
 
bmart, i know that at one time 100k shares were short. please cite any reputable source that says #1 those shares are still short and #2 there are more shares than that short. let's see what your knowledge level is. or, the lack thereof...