Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ignacio Mosqueira who wrote (19023)	3/21/1998 7:26:00 PM
From: epicure	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 108807

No Is NOT clear. There is that clear? Willey was working for the government, as a volunteer- technically I think she would be covered by sexual harassment in the workplace. If these accusations are true, and I have no opinion, until the evidence comes out, then Clinton engaged in a pattern of workplace harassment (not assault). (I wasn't arguing with you about assault- couldn't you tell that? I certainly didn't mention assault)

To: Ignacio Mosqueira who wrote (19023)	3/21/1998 10:31:00 PM
From: Grainne	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 108807

Ignacio, you are shouting! Why? I think we are all perfectly willing to suspend judgment until more of the facts are known. Of course when a person has a PATTERN of sexually predatory behavior, there is more of an implication that these things may be true. But this is not a court of law. Because the President is a public figure he is fair game for our discussion. Willey was definitely an employee of Clinton, working as a White House volunteer, and asking for a paid position. But finally, how do you know that no assault took place? None of us does, either way. That I cannot understand. Christine