SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Ballard Power -world leader zero-emission PEM fuel cells -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Sleeperz who wrote (2019)3/22/1998 8:41:00 AM
From: Meghan Richards  Respond to of 5827
 
<<
Not too many people would buy $1000/$160 shares of a stock.
But the question of Risk is for Ballard Power
$1000/$10 = 100 shares $1000/$160 = 6.25 shares.
>>

I really hope you are just teasing.

Typical advise is not to invest in various companies in
terms of equal share amounts, but in terms of an equal
dollar value.

Everything else being equal, there is more 'risk' investing
$10,000 in a $10 stock, than investing $10,000 in a $160
stock.

Please read a few books before you cause any significant
damage to your portfolio.



To: Sleeperz who wrote (2019)3/22/1998 3:09:00 PM
From: Lazlo Pierce  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 5827
 
CR, so in your scenario, al BLDPF would have to do is split 10 for 1, then you'd have your $12 stock. The point is not what the price per share is, rather the entire market capitilization, i.e. # shares x price/sh. You can have a stock w/5M shares trading @ 100 that is a lot cheaper priced (yet having the SAME MARKET CAP), than a stock that has say 100M shares trading @ 5. By not even mentioning this in your analysis earlier to me shows an alarming lack of insight.

<<Not too many people would buy $1000/$160 shares of a stock.
But the question of Risk is for Ballard Power
$1000/$10 = 100 shares $1000/$160 = 6.25 shares.
At $10 not alot of expectations were built into the market cap. But
at $160 alot of expectations are built into the market cap>>

Dave