Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Richard Mazzarella who wrote (31111)	3/22/1998 9:22:00 PM
From: Keith Rowland	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 35569

I am convinced that the metals are there. Yep. Trace amounts Just last week Maxam's Runyon, who I trust, told me that BRX is a good property. Why do you trust him? Does he have a sweet voice? Runyon isn't any better at delivering on promises than Furlong. The reason I was first drawn to IPM was the methodical scientific approach that they were applying to prove their property (I was a scientist). You liked their methodical science approach. That's good. Information from consultants was eagerly believed without the necessary analysis, they wanted to believe. Now I'm confused. You liked IPM because of their methodical scientific approach but now claim IPM management didn't use a scientific approach in analyzing the results from their consultants. So IPM is actually a bunch of boobs who are good at fooling the public? I don't think that there was anything sinister, just poor judgement. Of course. Who's ever heard of a gold scam before. All my speculation of course. Approved by Mr. Runyon, I'm sure.