Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Paramount Ventures & Finance -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: R.Goodman who wrote (586)	3/22/1998 11:30:00 AM
From: Yorikke	Respond to of 4884

Mr. Goodman, I don't believe that what I wrote implies any impatience. On the contrary. I'm willing to wait two to five years, or more if necessary. I just don't believe it is in anyone's interests to 'play' the events in such a way as to create these temporary periods of expectation. That is bad for everyone involved. And I don't believe that asking for more reliable information is a display of impatience. If things were laid out on the table a bit more clearly, I, for one, would spend my time looking at that and not posting so much trash. Again, please check out the Yamana thread and get a feel for the type of company response that provides information and a level approach to what is happening within the firm and the market place at large. You will see that this is not hype, it's just a firm's honest attempt to communicate with its shareholders. One for instance. As Chris has pointed out, we do not even have a good inventory of the properties held by the firm. What is the status of the diamond area stakings we had up in the area of the buffalo hills finds? Have we let them go? What are the plans for those properties? Just how many claims do we have in the Salta? What is their status? What about the Indo properties? These are all honest straight forward questions about things that have nothing due with hype. They could be posted on the company web site. I, like you, believe in the potential of this firm. I am not impatient for results. But I think that there are aspects of management that are seriously deficient. Strengthening these would not be 'Hype' or 'Promotion'; unless of course we view any information release as such. I'll write Paul. But I don't believe that one voice is going to change this situation. If we are going to turn things around and convince management of a need to change its information approach I believe that it is going to take the efforts of many of us. One final point. I do not agree with your contention that 50K is going to move the price appreciably. We are in a poker game here. And the show cards don't indicate much about what the parties are going to do. We have seen constant selling for months. And a price rise will have to face added shares which are not now on the table, but are ready to move none the less. We are going to need a big buyer to soak these up. Without such a major player on the buy side we are going to languish here. But when that decision is made I think we are off the floor and moving back up. Regards, mnmuench

To: R.Goodman who wrote (586)	3/23/1998 1:14:00 PM
From: Diamond Daze	Respond to of 4884

I personally went in there FOUR times to clean up those so called bids...next were at .80....Every time I took em out GS put em back in in 10k increments...so there may not be a lot of stock but I think it will be like 3 or 4 days of turning 1 million shares or more to see 1.00 to 1.50. Like every other business its real easy to lower your prices..its a real bitch to get them back up...The same applys here... P.S. this was after Christmas and after Tax selling was suppose to be over..... Salute