To: Chris who wrote (7232 ) 3/22/1998 1:30:00 PM From: Robert Graham Respond to of 42787
Continued thoughts on the market and its players: The best time to evaluate a technician and for that matter any market player is what they do when there are conflicting signs in the market like there were during the previous consolidation phase of the market that had mutiple false starts. When looking closely at how a technician evaluates this, do not subtract points if they adopt for a period of time a "wait and see" position since sometmes that is all a technician can do with the markets. However, they should at least be able to tell if a breakout attempt that appears to have turned into the beginning of a rally has strength to follow through even if that are not able to predict and judge the initial breakout itself, which can be much more difficult to do and prone to error in a volitile market. Another good time to get a read on a market player is by seeing how they respond to the sentiment of the market. Are they caught up in market sentiment where they ignore signs of an impending pullback or market correction? Or do they maintain a position *independant* of the current sentiment of the market? While the market is making new highs, if the market player responds with "fear" by taking short positions or moving their money out of the market before there is solid evidence there that would warrant such a position, they are still caught up in the market sentiment and their perspective has been compramised. Of course this is a judgement call. But then it may be worthwhile to see when and if they admit to their error and once again take the side of the trend. The biggest clue can come when this happens. If the person does admit to their error and now ends up ignoring significant indications of a market correction and gets caught in the market when the correction starts to happen, this market player is caught up in the sentiment of the market. Matter of fact, I would say this is further evidence that the market player had already been caught up in market sentiment back when they first pulled out of the market just to resume their trades. So when this happens, do not let them rationalize to you either action that they have taken. The reason I am going over this is that what I have described above IMO applies very well some of the highly visible traders that many follow here at SI. There is much more to succcess than a system even though a well designed and proven system when followed with discapline is an essential element to success. Going back to my definition of speculator, the trader who gets caught up in market sentiment either ignores their frame of reference or never did have an adequate and workable frame of reference in the first place that would help them monitor the market and know when to play and when not to play in the market. Anything that helps a trader to look objectively at the market and what it has to tell the trader is this "frame of reference". Looking at the "bigger picture" as discussed in this and previous posts helps. Also having a well-defined and well-proven system that is followed with discapline also helps provide a frame of reference. Experience in different kinds of makets over time helps too. Deciding when to trade and when not to trade is one of the most important choices a trader can make which is not a choice with many novice traders. After all, what they have been doing has worked for them in the past, right? So there is no reason for it to continue to work? Correct? Furthermore, this type of trader feels that since they can make money only by trading, they must *always* be trading in the market. But there may be times in the market it where the risk is much higher for the trader to follow their system and continue trading. They do not have any frame of reference to implicitly or explicity help them define this risk. The trader that does not have anything to provide them with this frame of reference or chooses not to follow their frame of reference is actually *speculating* in the market since some of the important risks of the market are invisible to them without the perspective that this frame of reference provides them. Such a speculator still can demonstrate success in the stock market and they can have come across something that is worth examining and making a note of for youself. Still I would not follow directly behind such traders and instead learn from what they can provide you as evaluated from your own perspective, experiences, and the understanding that you have developed for the market: your own "frame of reference". You need to make your own choices. But without a frame of reference to go by, how can one possibly make intelligent choices? And how can a trader know when not to follow those same choices in the future? This is important in a market that is always changing.