Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Rocky Mountain Int'l (OTC:RMIL former OTC:OVIS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: bmart who wrote (44228)	3/22/1998 1:20:00 PM
From: Angel D	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 55532

bmart, Thanks for dropping by. I think you have seen everything in its true perspective. Don't be afraid to drop in again. Best regards, Angel D

To: bmart who wrote (44228)	3/22/1998 1:40:00 PM
From: TideGlider	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 55532

Bmart: You really offer no information or analysis of the stock. Only a critique of posters. TG

To: bmart who wrote (44228)	3/22/1998 2:42:00 PM
From: Skeeter Bug	Respond to of 55532

>>But this has shown me what the Rocky Mountain shareholders have been enduring all this time, having to constantly defend misinformation.<< if the yays would stop putting out this misinformation then they wouldn't have to defend it ;-) i asked you to prove your short squeeze scenario. since you failed to do so and will not post on this thread any more the logical deduction is that you can't. since your view is not grounded in logical fact it must be grounded in fantasy. fantasy is better left to board and video games - not to your future financial well being. you can try to claim the position of a victim or a martyr - that's fine. those that espouse unverifiable, rank speculation as fact are not martyrs. they are rank amateurs posing to be something they aren't. just like pugs admitted to be. zealousnous w/o knowledge is a very dangerous thing. i'd suggest you get knowledge before you practice your zealousness. otherwise your zealousness will always be as misdirected as it is now.

To: bmart who wrote (44228)	3/22/1998 3:01:00 PM
From: Hawkmoon	Respond to of 55532

Mr. Reece, in all your theatrics, you evade that the company did make a public statement, the 8K. It is my understanding that it was what was required of Rocky Mountian Ltd. and they complied. bmart, Funny how you have the same uncanny ability to twist the truth as other RMIL yeas.. For the record I have acknowledge that RMIL put out a 8K. However, it has been the Yeas who have claimed that the company told them the SEC was satisfied with the filing while implying the SEC was no longer investigating the company. This is what ticks me off. Having gone through a similiar situation with one of my holdings, I fully understand that the SEC doesn't just say, "OK, thanks alot, everything is hunky-dory now" and let halted companies off the hook. RMIL, if the Cartel/Cavalry leaders can be believed, seems to be misinforming its shareholders as to what is actually going on. Tell me where you believe the original information about a tremendous short position eminated from?? I know Riley and Pugs didn't think it up by themselves. They were most encouraged by company management to believe this. This is the same management that apparently has no desire to substantiate this or provide basic data on outstanding shares or insider transactions. And for the record, I DID tell GRNO management that I don't care who takes the "rap" for what happened, my concern was for the corporate entity and their technology. And I continue to state that the only parties who will save that company will be the management team. bmart, I've been through a trading halt and I don't like them. But I have also learned that once one is implemented, it doesn't just end after the 10 day period. I also have learned that the only thing you should believe are the company's press releases after the halt because you have more assurance that they are being closely scrutinized for accuracy by authorities. And you're right it was your 3rd post on SI that brought you to this thread preaching about how you have done your diligence... blah, blah...etc. You're second post was to Presstek where you set the stage for posting here on RMIL, and also where you mentioned this alleged short position. Tell me bmart, did RMIL make any mention to you about this short position?? And if not, what basis do you have for accurately analyzing the merits of any claims to their being one?? I hope you don't decide to cease posting. You have attacked me and made subtle insinuations from your entrance on this thread. I rather enjoy doing battle with you. The only misinformation that I believe is being spewed is that which the company is unwilling to confirm in documented fashion. Regards, Ron