SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jim McMannis who wrote (50943)3/22/1998 7:46:00 PM
From: philipah  Respond to of 186894
 
Jim McM

Thanks for posting that article.

It re-re-reconfirmed Intel's positioning at the high end,
and IBM to make low priced dreck largely for internal consumption,
which conceivably weakens AMD et al further.

That was a bullish post.

Regards



To: Jim McMannis who wrote (50943)3/22/1998 8:34:00 PM
From: Paul Engel  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 186894
 
Jim - Re: "If you are long Intel read this...IBM - Low Cost Chip Producer"

Where in that article did it mention IBM's cost to produce chips?

Or AMD's cost to sell IBM-produced chips?

Or Cyrix's cost to sell IBM-produced chips?

Cyrix has been using this low cost IBM producer for 4 or 5 years and they have lost money in at least six of the last eight quarters (more or less).

So what advantage has IBM been to Cyrix?

Paul



To: Jim McMannis who wrote (50943)3/22/1998 8:59:00 PM
From: Mary Cluney  Respond to of 186894
 
Jim, >>>If you are long Intel read this...<<<

>>>The volume of Intel clones coming out of IBM will remain very low in comparison to Intel's output, said Michael Slater, founder of MicroDesign resources. IBM charges a premium for its foundry services, which will motivate all three manufacturers to keep as much of their chip production in-house. All three manufacturers have also continually fallen short of their sales goals for various reasons. <<<

>>>If all goes perfectly for Intel's competitors, all of them will ship 20 to 25 million units compared to 80 million from Intel. IBM will only make a fraction of those," Slater said. Still, he added, "it's a challenge in the sense that Intel is likely to lose some market share on the low end." <<<

>>>blah,blah,blah ...The "copper" PowerPC chip that debuted Monday probably won't begin to make an impact until next year, but IBM is already aggressively lobbying for market acceptance of its copper-based technology. blah, blah, blah....<<<

If you are a hedge fund operator, wait until after quarter-end before bad mouthing stocks. Money flow into mutual funds too strong to stop upward bias. Mutual funds will be doing a lot of windows 98 dressing.

Save your ammo. Don't waste it fighting the tape (or don't shoot all your wad at once - whatever that means).

Regards,

Mary