Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : TA- Advanced GET -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: John K who wrote (921)	3/22/1998 8:50:00 PM
From: Allan Harris	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1551

Ask yourself, "Why did I buy this program?" My answer: Because it's tools and patterns appear to identify profitable trading opportunities. True three years ago when I bought Advanced GET, true today. Who cares if it's Elliott count is "right" or "wrong?" Not I. Allan, King of France

To: John K who wrote (921)	3/23/1998 2:45:00 AM
From: Bruce A. Bowman	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1551

Hi John- No, I think Gary's view is about right in the context of a rigorous description of Elliott Wave theory. The fact is that Tom Joseph has found a correlation between EW patterns and MACD(5,35) and he has exploited that relationship. He's also bagged several additional indicators (many of which he's tweaked a little) and assembled all this in Advanced GET. Whether you refer to the presentation of price as Elliott Waves or Joseph Waves is of no consequence. The original concept is Elliott's and Tom Joseph has used it as the basis of a trading system. I heard somewhere that GET uses the 60% of EW that makes 80% of the money. I can't substantiate that, but it typifies the ideology that TTI uses in packaging GET as a trading tool box. They want to accumulate tools that offer traders an advantage. From my viewpoint, the EW numbering in GET offers a very different view of price. Bruce