Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : ACRT about to move to new highs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Goulds who wrote (4168)	3/23/1998 2:07:00 PM
From: Roma	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 7054

Do you know if the short-sellers behavior punishable by low?

To: Goulds who wrote (4168)	3/23/1998 2:28:00 PM
From: Joe Hoek	Respond to of 7054

Davef - you said: <<This part is not in the WSJ. It is, none the less, a fact. Dan Loeb specifically has been calling professional and personal contacts of ACRT and trying to milk out all the dirt he can.>> <<He made it easy. And pink was too dumb to realize how easy it would be to tie the two together. I could care less who pink is, he's just a dumb hired mouth paid to write what he is told to. >> Why is this fact? Because it was posted on Yahoo! Because you say so? Sorry, but Davef is a fictional character just like Mr. Pink, you cannot be verified either. I'll take anything written in the WSJ with a grain of salt, and anything anyone on these threads says even less. Where is the FACT that pink is paid by this Loeb guy? Don't say here's the facts, and then write some speculation that you have, it makes you look bad, and I question anything and everything that YOU have reported as FACT. Maybe YOU are being paid by Amos, or Stonkus to post positive hype on these threads. One never knows, do they? Keep facts as facts, opinions as opinions and speculation to yourself. Joe Hoek P.S. Davef - your armour is getting tarnished, get some polish and get back on your high horse - Actrade needs their knight in shining armour. The proceeding was an opinion, and not a paid advertisement, and not the views of Actrade management, Mr. Pink, Dan Loeb, WSJ, SI, Yahoo! or anyone else living or dead, real or fictional.

To: Goulds who wrote (4168)	3/23/1998 3:22:00 PM
From: stan s.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 7054

Wow, up 1/4 real time..................... Too early to say but it appears it's going to hold above support. Nice long lower shadow on the early dip to 11 3/4. Looks like we'll get a bullish hammer formation at close. scifi.co.uk Could signal a reversal...I'll have to wait for data later for confirmation. By the way I bought back in as it pulled back over 12 this morning. A bullish move.

To: Goulds who wrote (4168)	3/23/1998 6:57:00 PM
From: Dante Sinferno	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 7054

<<The problem is, there has been an obvious conspiracy to drive down the price of ACRT by lies, slander and personal attacks.>> Two things.... It's no more a conspiracy for shorts to reveal their arguments than vice-versa and ; If there "are" lies and slander , why has it been allowed to go on so long ? Wouldn't it follow that the longer these allegations linger without action by the company the greater the likelihood that they are true ? (some items seem like simple exaggerations or shall we say tongue in cheek type comments...i.e. camelian transport) I may go long for a trade tomorrow , but as one who has mostly watched this spectacle so far , it just strikes me as peculiar that "if" laws , rules , regs , etc are being broken here....wouldn't somebody have done something by now ???? Rob