Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Don't Ask Rambi -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jacques Chitte who wrote (8842)	3/23/1998 6:47:00 PM
From: username	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 71178

ANNOUNCING! I have an idea. I don't have much time to post right now, but I so enjoyed penni's story that I wished there were more. I would very much like to see more stories, like one from you. Or one from everyone.

To: Jacques Chitte who wrote (8842)	3/24/1998 1:07:00 AM
From: Lady Lurksalot	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 71178

Alex, If Rambi and Warning would be typed or categorized, I would liken them to pleasant and stimulating cocktail party banter, maintaining or changing direction easily at the whims of the threadsters of the moment. Of course, were you to read posts at random from Warning, Rambi, Quintex, etc., taking merely the content of the posts and not knowing from which thread they were extracted, I doubt that you would be able to determine their source. The same holds true for the serious stock threads. There are the market information threads, the blue chip threads, the BB threads, the threads which discuss various strategies or groups of stocks within types, and probably some others. I have observed that if one were to remove thread titles and any reference to the thread's subject stock or purpose and the ticker symbols, any given thread's content would be virtually indistinguishable from any other thread of its genre. Put this theory through a blind taste test, and I think you will agree. Holly