SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : Integral Technologies -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: VALUESPEC who wrote (283)3/23/1998 7:07:00 PM
From: BOB HOLZER  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1108
 
That is correct. If you look at their website under financials you will see the flow chart of where the money comes from. Under that scenario ETC ( a 78% owned subsidiary of ITKG) will receive $3.00 per antenna. So if IAS sells 1 million antennas it will mean $3 million for ETC. Another interesting point on that chart is the proposed selling price of the antennas. You will see that there is a substantially higher markup in selling price to the military vs. the commercial applications leading to a higher gross profit. Take this one step further based on gross profit ETC needs only to sell 200 antennas to IAS's 1,000 to have the same gross profit. Now if you factor in the $3.OO in and out (TEAM pays ETC $3,000 for 1,000 antennas and TEAM pays IAS $600 for 200 antennas made) you can see it pays for us to root for both companies!!

There is one concern that will need to be addressed and that is
What happens when a company like panasonic ( which sells it's product
to both the military and commercial institutions worldwide) wants to incorporate the antenna. WHICH COMPANY DO THEY BUY FROM AND HOW IS IT MONITORED?



To: VALUESPEC who wrote (283)3/23/1998 8:02:00 PM
From: jbal  Respond to of 1108
 
I wish ITKG all the best, I believe once IAS or ITKG receive a contract both companies will flourish.