Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : FAMH - FIRAMADA Staffing Services -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: CO who wrote (7686)	3/23/1998 6:08:00 PM
From: Cheryl Reifsteck	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 27968

Does anyone have access to after-market trades? If I read this correctly there were several shares traded after the bell that went as high as .64, but of course I could be wrong. quote.com

To: CO who wrote (7686)	3/23/1998 6:09:00 PM
From: HRAKA	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 27968

All, I had an order to buy for .59375 for the last hour - was not executed. Hraka

To: CO who wrote (7686)	3/23/1998 9:58:00 PM
From: HRGuy	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 27968

Buster Using 6 million shares just doesn't seem right. See if you can follow my logic, using the numbers in the press release 1997 FAMH EPS = .1085 Current outstanding shares FAMH = 40 million New Nasdaq FAMH EPS = .36 New Nasdaq FAMH Outstanding Shares = 11.97 million EPS = Earnings/Outstanding Shares or Earnings = EPS * Outstanding Shares Both Earnings assumptions should be the same, therefore .1085 * 40,000,000 = .36 * 11,970,000 $4,340,000 = $4,309,200 Not too far off, but what I have a problem with is the fact that they are applying the .1085 EPS to newly issued shares. Now I see why your math actually works its basically making the same assumption. Note this doesn't account for the buyback nor is it out of the realm of possibility that FAMH without this reverse merger could have an EPS of .1085 for 1998. Boy I hate posting this but as my boss always says the numbers will set you free. Lets be more honest with our assumptions IRA!!! CJ