Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : FAMH - FIRAMADA Staffing Services -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: CO who wrote (7703)	3/23/1998 7:55:00 PM
From: Sean McFarland	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 27968

TO ALL INTERESTED IN "The Other Company" . . Hmmmmm I am very interested in the other company we may merge with. I have been thinking . . . wouldn't it be prudent of Ira to do the deal in a friendly way . . . wouldn't it also be wise to offer the other company a deal they couldn't refuse . . . he surely wouldn't be offering to buy a company on a 1:4 when 4 shares of FAMH were substantially less than the going rate of the other companies shares. . . the other shareholders would not receive any instant value like most sought out companies usually do ( i.e. company A offers to buy company B for 1.2 or 1.25 times their current per share value.) . . . In our case, if FAMH pursues a company in the, let say $9 range, the stock value is not necessarily going to remain at that level right away. . . . . . . . But, if FAMH offers to buy a company that is valued at less than 4X FAMH price, the "other company" would probably go for it rather easily. . . . . . . . I have located a company that I think is "the one". I have done a great deal of DD, including technical, fundamental, and logical research as well as calling the CFO. I had a discussion with him and he basically said, "I can't confirm or deny that a merger is in the works". "I can say that we are and have been positive about a merger if the deal were good enough" . . . . Anyone interested in discussing them ? Please private message me , because I don't think it fair to discuss this at large. Gwynnfan, Longer FAMH.

To: CO who wrote (7703)	3/23/1998 8:12:00 PM
From: Mel Viticus	Respond to of 27968

Off Topic Cheryl, do you (or anyone else) have the opening share prices on the days when the "Undervalued Dog" recommended the following stocks:ADGI, NETZ, HNLY, CCGI, and FAMH? Since I only just started getting their e-mail I don't have the dates of recommendation, nor do I know how to research accurate share price history on pennies... (Graphs don't help me....) I'd like to see a performance to date study on their picks as they have not responded to my e-mails... Thanks in advance anyone! Yo Melviticus du Toga

To: CO who wrote (7703)	3/23/1998 8:40:00 PM
From: Wink	Respond to of 27968

Cherly, Brad: I believe what you say is true. I can follow the reasoning and agree with all of the calculations, BUT the press release must have other errors besides the 1997-1998 mistake. If you look at (read) the release it clearly says 40,000,000 shares are used in all subsequent calculations... "The following share considerations are used in subsequent calculations: --Firamada Shares Outstanding: 40,000,000 --NASDAQ Company Shares Outstanding: 1,413,913 --Brokerage Warrant percentage at time of Merger: 4.9%" and then again uses 10,000,000 plus the other company's shares and warrants to come up with 11,973,195 shares at $0.36. "Based of [sic] Firamada's pre-merger EPS of $.1085 for 1997, and the proposed post-merger total number of shares (11,973,195), the new EPS calculation for a NASDAQ Listed Firamada company would be approximately $.36." Another mistake in the press release or am I missing something! Pleasssssse tell me I'm wrong. ;>)