Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : EDTA (was GIFT) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Michael Tosto who wrote (1694)	3/24/1998 8:56:00 AM
From: Mel Spivak	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2383

I do not think that Arnold will give you the answers. I know he is very confident. He knows that GIFT does not need a 100% vistory for GIFT to be a "home run". A Home Run means that enough "significant" patent claims are upheld to make it very valuable. It has been quite a while since I read the patent. So if the right claims are upheld, it has all be "worth it". A project would be to analyze each claim and "value" it. Arnold, you know the patent better than most. Could you "rate" the importance of the patent's claims? mel

To: Michael Tosto who wrote (1694)	3/24/1998 11:41:00 AM
From: Arnold Freilich	Respond to of 2383

Michael, I am a businessman, not an attorney. Therefore my "educated opinions" can only come from attorneys. I am very confident about E-data's position and the legal interpretations taken by its attorneys and experts. I am not a person qualified by engineering experience or education to express opinions on specific patent claims. I thank GRC for posting the docket, but please remember that I am no longer an insider who is informed by the attorneys. I am attempting to find out exactly what the terminated docket means. Arnold