Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Micron Only Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TREND1 who wrote (31080)	3/23/1998 11:03:00 PM
From: Skeeter Bug	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 53903

larry, mike called mu's deterioration almost to a "t." that is more beneficial than posting 90% positive news when eps are tanking more and more each q. if everything was 90% positive then mu wouldn't be bleeding, would it ;-)

To: TREND1 who wrote (31080)	3/24/1998 9:03:00 AM
From: mike iles	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 53903

Larry, I guess what riles me about DJ is that he pretends to be a neutral provider of facts when he isn't. Maybe he could just put a disclaimer before each article ... 'DJ is a forever bull and only publishes articles that he thinks put MU in a positive light' Yeah, that would make me feel better. And come to think of it he doesn't just give us stories, he also editorializes .... what else do you call the bolding of the Smith Barney SDRAM shortage in July comment? Larry, I would be delighted to give you some facts about MU (inventory, cost of production, financial postion, etc...) but something tells me you're not interested. After coming up and stomping around in the FA pasture, you'll just pull your old disappearing act and scoot down the TA gopher hole ...' FACTS, FACTS, you couldn't handle the facts mister!' (wanting to use that one for a long time -g-) regards, Mike