Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : CYCOMM (CYII)-on aquisition trail -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lou Cifer who wrote (1147)	3/24/1998 1:13:00 AM
From: Robert Morrison	Respond to of 1800

Lou. I guess no profit means no fundamentals in the traditional sense but with the big jump in revenues and falling losses the trend is obvious enough for everyone to point and jump up and down about what is coming. Let's face it, the low volumes we had on speculation of a positive 4Q were enough evidence that this stock doesn't not exist in the minds of any serious players and the point made that no big buyers came in after the announcement backs this up. The whole 4Q presentation was a bit a damp squib. The issue, that everyone seems to agree on, is that it is time to come out of hiding, get some confidence and go for it...there are no prizes for second place. The Board has a duty to ensure the stock is continually trading at its true value. If the stock is worth more than $2 1/4 then CYI needs to elaborate why it is worth more to the marketplace, simple as that. It's a disservice to shareholders and the company (if it wants to issue stock for expansion) to not do otherwise. The insider trades of late are a very positive sign. If there are plans for more then get them over and done with and get the price up. Like I've said, even with fundamental profits reported I don't think the market is going to react and if it does then we can expect meagre earnings multiples. There is enough indication of emerging profits and market share now to sell this company effectively so spend a $100,000 on advertising or give 100,000 shares to stock promoter...it's time. Rob

To: Lou Cifer who wrote (1147)	3/24/1998 8:55:00 AM
From: Don Parker	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1800

Lou, maybe you misunderstood my post. I did not say that the brokerage houses on the conference call were analyst nor did I say that hype is the basis for stock price appreciation. I did say that no one knows about Cycomm and I blame management for that solely. If you hype a stock it probably means nothing to anyone but you but if an article is written in an investment news letter or magazine not necessarily "hyping the stock" it does in fact have that effect if the company is in a turnaround situation or the future of their product is encouraging to the reader. Call it "hype", "information", "news", or whatever you like the results is the same. Why do people read the WSJ or any other investment publication.... for information, that's why. NO ONE KNOWS THE CYCOMM STORY...WHY???