Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Crystallex (KRY) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mama Bear who wrote (7369)	3/24/1998 1:18:00 AM
From: marcos	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 10836

"I can discredit the 2 for 20 call by giving more than 2, so here goes...DNA,SOLV,AVNT,ZONA,ERGB,KRY. Wow. That's 6." It's a bit early to count KRY, the story's not over. Looks like we don't need to wonder if Barbara J Payne is stretching the truth or not anymore -g-

To: Mama Bear who wrote (7369)	3/24/1998 12:04:00 PM
From: Robert A. Sutherland	Respond to of 10836

Bingo! different metrics. E.C is using the "no-value" result, you are using the x% result. What is right? If Asensio makes you money, he is right? Using this metric means he is ALWAYS right because he publicizes his attack (something other short experts have publicly expressed discomfort with), which brings the stock price down so all can cover. Viola! What is wrong? After Asensio covers and the situation is corrected (whatever the situation is, it doesn't matter. By definition the stock was overvalued because it went down, didn't it?) the stock doubles in value. But wait a minute, did the fundamentals change? Sometimes. So, do right and wrong matter with Asensio? If you define right and wrong as making and losing money.. yes. He cares very little for the accuracy of his fundamentals, because they change with time. Read his disclosure about "forward looking statements".