To: CO who wrote (7827 ) 3/24/1998 10:55:00 AM From: Wayne J. Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 27968
Hello! Cheryl, It appears that someone is trying to throw a little turmoil into the longstanding shareholders of FAMH on this thread! I don't have a problem when anyone expresses an opinion or view. as long as they clearly state that is just that ! ( Their opinion or view!) Now! In my opinion whatever the motivational reasons are that LE is sharing this information he claims to have ( regarding the company that FAMH may be associated with!) brings me to the question, " Since FAMH has apparently not made a public news release announcing which company they are planning to be associated with . leads me to think that at least to this point in time , it would be considered insider information! ( Of course just my own opinion!) If for what ever reason LE was in fact able to gain access to what in my opinion I would consider insider information, then I would seriously question his reasons and motivation for doing so! If it turns out that he indeed is not a shareholder , but has in fact gone to a great deal of effort in snooping around ( where his snooping in my opinion could temporarily cause undo stress and anxiety for some investors)---in efforts to bring an I told you so! to this thread---in my opinion he is walking a very fine line in potentially getting himself into a lot of trouble! For someone who appears to be hiding behind a ficticious name, and appears in my opinion to be on a very regular basis attempting to discredit a company FAMH ( and yes if in fact he is trying to discredit FAMH , in the same turn then he would be discrediting me, being a shareholder of the company! In my opinion his scare tactics are now starting to cross the line! Whether he is accurate in the information regarding the company or not! Getting insider information ( motivation for a non-shareholder?) or not! Where I come from getting non-public information and announcing it on a public forum in my opinion is not playing within the rules of fair play. And in some cases against the law! I imagine that LE will have some wise crack retort/response , it doesn't matter to me in the least, as I have already said he has crossed a line, and in my opinion is tampering with people's hard earned investment dollars. ( Lets use the expression or feeling that I sense from this! I sense someone is trying to sink a ship , on which they are not a passenger on!) I think that pretty well describes what I feel about LE's attempted intimidation and scare tactics! Cheryl! Sorry that the positive influences and contributors aren't getting more of the support they warrant! ( In my own opinion!) Keep up the Great Work Cheryl! You have my 100% support! Best Regards, Wayne J.