SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Naxos Resources (NAXOF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: jlallen who wrote (10904)3/24/1998 1:30:00 PM
From: mark silvers  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 20681
 
John,
I"m not understanding you:-) Here is what I believe(not that I'm any more right or wrong than anyone else) The last set of numbers IMPLY that a commercially viable process with conventional methodology MAY be possible.
If true, that would allow us to "play" around with with J/L at out leisure, fine tuning it and seeing if it is indeed a commercially viable process.

In the meantime, we have a pilot plant that relies upon the use of attritters. That, when used in a more mainstream, conventional process would be decidedly uneconomical due to the high cost of operating the attriters.

I hope we are on same wavelength.... :-)

Mark



To: jlallen who wrote (10904)3/24/1998 4:56:00 PM
From: Johnny Nucleo  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 20681
 
Conventional recovery will not work on Franklin Lakes. Basically, I
think Naxos is back to square one because it is obvious johnson
process will not scale.

J. Nucleo