Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : TAVA Technologies (TAVA-NASDAQ) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: C.K. Houston who wrote (13227)	3/24/1998 4:32:00 PM
From: RumKola	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 31646

Cheryl I think most everyone on this thread would much rather give you a big hug than a pinch! JDP

To: C.K. Houston who wrote (13227)	3/24/1998 4:34:00 PM
From: Rich Dee	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 31646

Cheryl- You aren't dreaming, but I know the shorts are having a NIGHTMARE! I think I'm going to have to call in drunk tomorrow! Rum & Coke Rich

To: C.K. Houston who wrote (13227)	3/24/1998 4:35:00 PM
From: M. Frank Greiffenstein	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 31646

I pinched myself, then sold half... I decided to unload half my position today at 13. I'll let my profits run until the ConfCall. Just intuition, there has got to be profit taking setting in soon. Shares were cheap at 8, they are not cheap now. Let's see if I should have stayed in a dream state <g>. DocStone

To: C.K. Houston who wrote (13227)	3/24/1998 4:36:00 PM
From: Mighty_Mezz	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 31646

I volunteer! ;-) :::pinchpinch::: Must be one of those funds which didn't see TAVA until it crossed 10. LOL Does anyone else think that some future news may have leaked, or is it just me? [Thank heaven I finally gave up yesterday on waiting for a dip. ROFL!] Is anyone calling IR or the company for a "comment on the price movement"?

To: C.K. Houston who wrote (13227)	3/24/1998 4:43:00 PM
From: John Mansfield	Respond to of 31646

Cheryl, Cheers and thanks again for all the efforts! Runup might be caused by pending news; but also by the embedded y2k getting into the open in the last weeks/months IMO. I can see a clear trend in all the articles I have read online the last months: more and more, embedded y2k issues are mentioned; even in general y2k articles; or articles about y2k in IT systems; IT y2k vendors etc etc. This all helps getting TAVA into the picture. Regards, John

To: C.K. Houston who wrote (13227)	3/24/1998 5:01:00 PM
From: paul boudreau	Respond to of 31646

I've checked the top 10 on the web site twice since 4:00. Very interesting. I saw a "apbank" "snapon" and a couple of others that looked interesting. Is there anyway to get a complete list, it would be fun reading. I think the number of hits will start going up just from people checking out the "last ten". I asked my supervisor what we were doing for embedded y2k (large nuke). Basically he said that the engineers are doing research and contacting vendors. As we all know that probably isn't going to cut it. When the NRC says "prove it" I don't think research and the word from the vendor will satisfy them. Testing might but you may not be able to test everything since there is no way to put in a dummy date to simulate 1\1\2000 on some equipment. As far as vendors go I seriously doubt that they will give written affidavides assuring that there equipment is compliant, especially on older stuff. The risk of lawsuits if they're wrong is too great. We have been getting written assurance on any new equipment we've bought the last couple of years. We need to get Skipard back over here to celebrate. He's busy getting the word out and trying to calm nerves over at the ccsi thread. If you want to know if this guy knows what he's talking about look at the charts for radaf and ccsi over the last 6 months, not to mention tava. Anyway, I don't post often but I couldn't help but join in the celebration today. As Bo Diddley would put it.... This stock is a killa dilla. Paul