Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Osicom(FIBR) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: David Pawlak who wrote (6185)	3/24/1998 7:41:00 PM
From: Stewart V. Nelson	Respond to of 10479

David Did you get a chance to speak with Bob Ingraham at Brooks to confirm the e-mail he sent me? regards Stewart Nelson

To: David Pawlak who wrote (6185)	3/24/1998 9:34:00 PM
From: marketmover	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 10479

David P -- I don't know how to respond to that except to try to give you more color on my conversations. At Dynacs, I was told the scope of the engagement was to hook up the Gigamux and confirm that it configured. Dynacs often does this for product vendors, to sort of "initiate coverage" of the product. Then a potential customer can retain Dynacs in the future to do further evaluation, which is where Dynancs make its money. Dynacs does a lot of work for Kenedy Space Center. HOWEVER NASA DID NOT REQUEST THIS WORK AND DOESNT KNOW FIBR FROM GUACAMOLE. So the November press release by FIBR is a pack of 10b-5 lies. Brooks Stockton lab does much of the same, primarliy for Brooks. But in this instance, I was told, FIBR requested to use the site to run their own test with their own technicians, which they did. This was the first and last contact between FIBR and Brooks. So the December press release by FIBR was a pack of 10b-5 lies. You wrote about some foreign banks who were allegedly testing Gigamux too. What have you heard?