Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Concurrent Computer (CCUR) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: satchmo who wrote (3038)	3/25/1998 10:29:00 AM
From: ENOTS	Respond to of 21143

hummmmm touchy......careful boys!!!!!!

To: satchmo who wrote (3038)	3/25/1998 5:48:00 PM
From: steve olivier	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 21143

Satchmo, What's the matter, did Don hit a nerve or maybe you are upset because you clients are going to ride this baby back to low 2's? I have read yours and Don's posts and quite frankly, he adds more value to the thread. You seem to be all hype. For those who care, there were 316,000 more shares traded on the ask vs. bid today and the stock didn't move. It most likely means that the buyers today were supplied stock from MM inventory or the MM's shorted it to them. Should go lower over near term so that the MM's can replace inventory or cover shorts.

To: satchmo who wrote (3038)	3/25/1998 10:39:00 PM
From: Don Hand	Respond to of 21143

Satchmo I apologize for my choice of words. Rushing in my new limited time is affecting my good judgement. Although I do not recall the exact spelling; your last name matches a lawyer at SFA. I am not interested in reporting anyone to anyone. As to the definition of an investor; one does not have to live the product to own stock in it. Even those you believe they are near experts have suffered with CCUR. To conclude: "If I can't earn it legally that I don't want it" A paraphrase from a respected CCUR poster some time ago.