Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Zulu-tek, Inc. (ZULU) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: PartyTime who wrote (4755)	3/25/1998 12:35:00 PM
From: Jon Tara	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 18444

The hidden importance in this lawsuit is not the impact of the lawsuit itself - $200,000 is not likely to cause great harm to the company, especially when they were allegedly already obligated to pay it. The real point of interest to investors here is the apparent control of the company by Pattison Hayton, which many here had hoped had been conveniently swept under the rug. Now he is allegedly authorized to sign checks on behalf of the company, where the company's own officers are not, and also is allegedly majority shareholder of the company.

To: PartyTime who wrote (4755)	3/25/1998 12:51:00 PM
From: wildbill	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 18444

PartyTime, Maybe Colvin is upset because he didn't have a better "Golden Parachute" in place. Even if he didn't see it(the takeover) coming, it seems like he should of been more prepared. What might be more interesting is if he was allowed to take any clients with him or if he was forbidden from contact with any clients for a specified amount of time. wildbill

To: PartyTime who wrote (4755)	3/25/1998 1:00:00 PM
From: jerimiah	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 18444

Thanks a lot Partytime for that article of a turn coat employee from Zulu, now working for no less then the very news rag that was supposed to be a TECH.net magezine, not a Family Circle type, doing HITMAN type revenge stories against ZULU. NOW IT ALL BECOMES VERY CLEAR INDEED.I have to admit, be it all embarassing, nevertheless. EVEN above and beyond my daily PEP CHEER sort of posting, in the back of my mind, i was concerned at what Wired had to say.Not about Mr. Hayton, or any specific wealthy investor in particular. But by the FIERCE way they were attacking our company, with such a minute amount of substance, only speculation against Zulu.But i see it as plain as this computer right in front of me.This disgruntled employee, gets paid not only for his JOSEPH VALACHI style snittching and creating his story so it would SEEM like it was WORTH something. Plus, he gets a JOB.DOES THIS NOT NOW AND OF ITSELF SHOW US ALL THE POWER AND MONEY INVOLVED IN NET ADVERTISING.Plus folks, do not be complacent, because WE STILL DO NOT KNOW WHO is behind pushing WIRED to go with this. If it is not Doubleclick, then it certainly is A POWER in the MEDIA-ADVERTISING front yearning to possess something WE (NETZ) now owns.Mark my words here folks.If i did not presently own NETZ, i would get me a broker on the phone imediately and buy me some NETZ.WOW