SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Strictly: Drilling and oil-field services -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Broken_Clock who wrote (16497)3/25/1998 2:21:00 PM
From: Ms. X  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 95453
 
Thank you so much, you are a peach for clearing that up for me. I missed the TA bashing. I agree with you 100%. You need both to make a good investment decision.
I'm glad I put the FA portion in my response no matter how small. Maybe that saved me from a smacking about the head and shoulder area.

Thanks,

Jan



To: Broken_Clock who wrote (16497)3/25/1998 3:21:00 PM
From: Chuzzlewit  Respond to of 95453
 
PK, you're doing pretty well on that tack! Fact is that I originally bought VRC at about $11.50 last spring. I bought more VRC on the way down (about $23), and more yet just before earnings were announced at $21). Now while some other folks have become unglued about oil, this little baby has been an absolutely stellar performer in my portfolio returning well over 100% on an annualized basis. Look at each of the returns using $27 as the current price:

bought in April at 11.50. Annualized return = 153.7%
bought in November at $23. Annualized return = 61.8%
bought in February at $21. Annualized return = 2019.4%

Sure, it would have been nice to sell when the stock was up to about $34, and buy back when it was around $18, but who knew? Not I.

So I say let the fundamentals ride. I am certain that one day my laggards, GLM and ESV will begin making some real money for me if there is no significant change in their fundamentals.

Regards,

Paul