Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : JESUS and FINANCIAL FREEDOM -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Kenneth Kirk who wrote (765)	3/26/1998 3:12:00 AM
From: Jane Hafker	Respond to of 1283

Well, of course you knew this was coming. The question: Does SI allow for roving bands of verbal muggers to shut down the Word of God? That is something that should be determined now for the Love of Jesus Christ. I feel personally that if I can't make a stand against lightweight demons found here, I will stand poorly before whatever is down the road. But, also I don't believe the mad hatter should be allowed to move over here and completely trash all of the eating places, that's why I've stayed away for the most part for awhile. Something about this whole thing is just twisted. It isn't right. Gregor? I highly respect your input. Ken, thank you for standing up for our place of quiet fellowship with our Most Precious Lord, Jesus Christ, before whom the devil and his angels just flee, by the way. That just happens to be pure fact. However, in the world I would have a restraining order against this guy, and the cops would enforce it. If I felt there was a glimmer of hope of salvation then this would be a "ministry". Obviously this man is in spiritual need, but it cannot be given a demon. Until he gives up the demon, this demon tries to jerk the chains of the Christians who have very little time together to discuss things that matter. I believe this is why it is an important precedent to set. What is the standard for SI? I believe it should be set. All of this is the lowest form of spamming, and goes unhindered, while wishing people Merry Christmas ON CHRISTMAS was harshly dealt with by those "who did not appreciate the religious reference." Again, Gregor, I have told you for some time I hate to even speak here as I have stalkers. Now you know what I'm talking about. The problem I'm having is that there is a completely surreal aspect to all this. I can hardly even believe it, yet it appears to in fact be happening. It is madness. It this in any way shape or form part of "Christian" requirements to tolerate this nonsense? I'm having difficulty seeing it as anything but a matter for the SI police, actually. e

To: Kenneth Kirk who wrote (765)	3/26/1998 3:32:00 AM
From: Graystone	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1283

Mr. Kirk or The Last Post I am sorry that I have disturbed your repose, I came only to ask gregor the questions I have posted. I am aware that this can cause turbulence in a thread and I accept your rebuke. I will not come to this thread in this fashion again. I regret that I am so focused on this issue but I feel great harm is being done because this is not being addressed in the community which claims her as sister. Jane has caused much harm to people, even if you have been unaware of that, you must address the issues of belief which she raises. If you want to discuss issues of belief, as you claim, please direct yourself to the questions I have raised with gregor. All these questions deal with things which I hope gregor can clear up for everybody on this thread. I feel required to engage people only in polite conversation, I think others should also do the same, don't you. So personally, I think you are far to simple a person to address the questions which I have asked. None of these questions deal with how I feel about Jane but I am quite sure you would see that if you read them. All deal with what you claim you are interested in. You have accepted Jane and back her claim of fraternity while she teaches others, have you no shame ?